Resources

CVMA Policy on Owner vs. Guardian

Facts:

Changing the term from Owner to Guardian is not needed, and in fact, will result in many unintended consequences for pet owners.

  • Not just a “warm-and-fuzzy” change in terminology
  • It will lead to confusion and create a quagmire of legal issues for the courts, government, veterinarians, and families with pets
  • Jeopardizes the readily available health care delivery system for animals by unnecessary legal delays
  • Animals are not, and never will be, able to care for themselves if emancipated
  • There is no real evidence that the name change will benefit and actually improve the quality of life for our pets
  • Changing the term to “guardian” will not prevent the animal abuse, cruelty and neglect that exists today in our society
  • The terms “owner” and “guardian” are two entirely different legal designations and cannot be used interchangeably
  • It could undermine our laws that protect animals and provide public safety — most are predicated upon the determination of “ownership” and may not apply

© 2017 California Veterinary Medical Association

Need Help With the VACSP Program?

The CVMA is here to assist you during the implementation of the VMB's Veterinary Assistant Controlled Substance Permit Program (VACSP)....

Read More...

In the News

2017 Economic Issues Report

The CVMA is pleased to release the 2017 Economic Issues Report on economic trends affecting the veterinary profession in California....

Read More...

Join the CVMA

As a CVMA member, you’ll have access to outstanding benefits and services.

Discover the benefits of membership »